
Significant elements of Pentecost can be distilled by comparing and contrasting Pentecost of the Old with Pentecost of the New Testament. A study like this is very humbling because, just as I believe that I have seen improvements on what I was taught, it means that others have been doing the same and someone else will improve on what I am saying. To me it seems blatantly obvious that the Holy Spirit was not first made available at Pentecost but is was SHED ABROAD at Pentecost. That is what Paul was explaining to the gentile Romans (Romans 5:5). Before that it was confined to a select group. Read on to understand why I am so convinced. You can also check for why this is an important part of the Pattern for life given by God.
It might also be useful to consider a summary of the subjects presented in articles on the subject of Pentecost:
Significant Elements of Pentecost
The Holy Spirit was already given following Passover in both cases.
- They were made separate since Passover in both cases (apart from Egypt in the Old, apart from the sinful world in the New).
- They had the pillar of fire in the Old and He breathed on them and said receive the spirit in the New
- God was with them in the tabernacle Exodus 33:7 hence they had the Holy Spirit. Their bodies was the Temple of God in the New and it was how the father revealed things to Simon Peter (Matthew 16:17).
- They were given the law as part of a marriage in both cases (Israel got it at Sinai, It lead the disciples to repentance (John 6:44).
- What do you mean when you say that they did not have the Holy Spirit or that it was only working with them but not in them? How can something affect your thoughts and attitude without being in you?
People claim that the Holy Spirit was given at Pentecost. It seems to me that it was not. The doctrine about the Holy Spirit working with them but not in them is an unscriptural invention necessary to cope with the volume of evidence against the theory. The earnest of the Spirit is given at baptism which is symbolic of Passover not Pentecost (Colossians 2:12). We also see the evidence in Acts.
What do we see almost immediately after the fulfilment of Passover.
Verses 22 and 23 are together but people often quote the first part separately to give credence to their claim that it was intended for the future. It was a commitment that He started at that point, before Pentecost. Both in the Old and New Testaments the Holy Spirit is given at Passover not Pentecost. In the Old Testament it was represented by water and Fire e.g. water in the cloud and of course the pillar of fire. In the New Testament it was given by the laying on of hands following Baptism, which is symbolised by the Red Sea and is part of the Passover season, then comes Sinai where we get Pentecost, but something special was added by Christ immediately after His Resurrection.
Nobody owns the Holy Spirit. Even Paul said that after all of His effort he could be a castaway (1 Corinthians 9:27). It is given as a seal and can be taken away.
The concept of the Holy Spirit with you and not in you suggests that somehow it becomes something that is completely under your control. In reality it always works the same way, it is Christ and the Father joining with our spirit and there is no difference before and after any point in time, that is just how it works.
Hebrews 1:6-7
So what did happen at Pentecost? What does the cloven tongues of fire mean? To start with let us explore Hebrews 1:6-7.
In Hebrews the writer is combining scriptures from two separate places (1) let all the angels of God worship him...
, (2) maketh his angels spirits...
, but where are those places? Where does he get this from and what does he mean? By the way, notice that the fire was cloven, one part for the Father and one part for Christ.
Who maketh his angels spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire
The second part is easy to spot.
But taken on its own the phrase does not make sense. The first thing that we need to establish is that the Hebrew word translated as angel has an everyday meaning.
- a messenger.
- (specifically, of God) an angel.3.
- thus, also) a prophet, priest or teacher.
It means messenger and that is what is being spoken of also in Hebrews. He turns His messengers into spirit beings and his servants, who are the same messengers, into flames of fire (fire purifies and gives light). One of the problems with understanding this verse is unscriptural beliefs about angels. According to the Bible angels are our older brothers. We were created lower than them for a time but will be like them eventually. When Christ explained the Kingdom of God He explained it in terms of angelic behaviour i.e. marry and not marry.
Spirits represent the apostolic work in the Church. In general spirit relates to God acting through His Church, now by the earnest of the Spirit but later fully formed i.e. in the resurrected Church as described in Revelation. In Revelation 5:6 it says that these are seven Spirits of God sent forth into all the earth
. The word for sent forth
is apostello
and is clearly the source of apostle
. Since there were not seven apostles, this refers to the function of spreading the Gospel by the seven churches, but apostles did more than just talk.
The first place that we find apostle in Revelation is in chapter 2 verse 2 dealing with the Synagogue of Satan. The Church was able to recognise and distinguish a fake Jew from a real one and by extension, fake apostles from real ones. Revelation shows us various ways of looking at the Church. 7 spirits shows that this one message was sent to the world by His apostles that are complete and whole as a group.
In Psalms and Hebrews, quoted above, angel and minister is referring to the same subject by using different words and the action of maketh
is taking place to produce two outcomes on the same subject. The previous verse tells us that all angels worship him. It is His angels/messengers that are made spirits and these spirits are sent to the world. The angels made spirits is what happened at Passover but the made flame of fire is what happened at Pentecost and together it prepared them to be sent to all the world as apostles.
Christ said then when He left He would send His Spirit. Was it the same spirit that was in John the baptist?
let all the angels of God worship him
The first part of the scripture is somewhat more challenging. The writer of Hebrews said let all the angels of God worship Him. Where does that come from? Some people believe that it comes from Deuteronomy.
That is what it says in the KJV and that is not very helpful. In The New Living Translation it says this:
The NLT introduces God's angels
to the sentence. Is that what Christ intends us to focus on in Hebrews? The Hebrew manuscripts that were preserved and used by the Rabbis is called the Masoretic Text. The NLT has used different manuscripts, the LXX or Septuagint, which is a Greek translation of the Old Testament that also predates the New Testament. In researching this I came across an article at the website of CARM - Christian Apologetics and Research Ministy entitled What verse is Hebrews 1:6 citing and why isn’t it in my Old Testament?
by Luke Wayne, dated Oct 2, 2017, https://carm.org/what-verse-hebrews-1-6-citing-why-not-in-my-old-testament#footnote2_ogej7i0 which sheds even more light on it than they realise. The article claims that a reading of Martin Abegg Jr., Peter Flint, and Eugene Ulrich, The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible (HarperCollins Books, 1999) 193 presents the reading as:
Rejoice, O heavens together with him; and bow down to him all you gods, for he will avenge the blood of his sons, and will recompense those who hate him, and will atone for the land and his people,(Deuteronomy 32:43, 4QDeutq, Dead Sea Scrolls).
The word translated gods is Elohim. Another place to be considered for the origin of the verse in Hebrews is Psalm 97,
You can check this one for sure and see that the word translated god
is Elohim
. Now let us go back and see what the writer of Hebrews was saying.
These angels are Elohim. They are of the family of God and have the same nature. They are sons of God just as we hope to be: immortal elohim. The elohim of God is us in the future with our elder brothers the angels. This is what is given in type on the day of Pentecost. The Church is accepted as the immortal bride of Christ and we all worship Him.
With You and soon in you
I cannot reconcile the knowledge that Joshua had the Holy Spirit IN him (Numbers 27:18) with a belief that the Spirit was not IN the disciples before Pentecost.
To me this misunderstanding is explained by Philippians, For I know that this shall turn to my salvation through your prayer, and the supply of the Spirit of Jesus Christ
, Philippians 1:19 (KJV). Notice that it is the Spirit of Christ and hence would not be available when He was human on earth. This same Spirit is the Spirit of God. Notice the two used interchangeably in the same verse.
And in the same chapter
In verse 3 Paul points out that he is talking of the Spirit of the living God which represents the Father as dominant. In verse 17 he shows that it is the Spirit of the Lord and Lord
refers to Christ. So we understand that it would not be available by Christ's power while He was mortal, but at all other times. Christ in the old form would have been available to John the baptist but the New Christ with the experience of mortality (Hebrews 4:14-15) who can comfort us from personal experience, would only be available to him in the flesh while He was a man. Furthermore the new Spirit, that by the suffering of Christ had earned the Kingdom, would not be available until after His resurrection. Thereafter the Spirit would not have been as it was in the wilderness when Christ fasted and Satan claimed to own the world, it would now be a Spirit of power over all the Earth having wrested it from Satan. So the Spirit that was with them in the form of Christ was later in them as now in us by the Holy Spirit.
Why was the Spirit not available?
According to the scripture what prevented the spirit was the Resurrection.
I understand glorified to refer to the Resurrection. That is when Christ was changed as is seen by Him having no blood but still sustaining a physical body. There was no pain or blood when Thomas poked around in the wounds that were only three days old. In John 20:27 Christ told him to put in his hand not just his finger. There is more to that than can be covered here so we just leave it as that.
The Comforter
Christ said that they should wait and receive power at Pentecost. Was that power the comforter? I think not. Actually, to be precise they were to receive another comforter.
They were to receive another comforter so what comforter did they have then? At the time their comforter was Christ living with them. They knew Him. This is explained in verses 15-17. In verse 18 Christ emphasized that it would be Him just in another form. He then went on to further explain how it works. Although they had access to the Holy Spirit for other things (including access to the Father) their comfort came from Christ who consoled Thomas. Further explanation is given in verse 23. Although they would continue to have the access to the the Father which He promised them, it would be we
at that time in the future, and not just the Father represented in the Holy Spirit as it was at the time. In verses 13-14 they were given the right to approach the Father. The only way that I know that would be possible is if they had the earnest of the Holy spirit in them to identify them as His. II Corinthians 1:21-22 [KJV] says, Now he which stablisheth us with you in Christ, and hath anointed us, is God; [22] Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts
. It would be the Father who sealed them upon Christ's request. Now back to John 14, in verse 26 Christ elaborates further; The comforter would be the Holy Spirit sent by the Father but would now include Him (Christ). At the incident with Thomas Christ fit the description that He gave them of what Spirit is. The power was something else which we examine later as the Promise of the Father.
One function of the Holy Spirit was to replace Christ as comforter. Christ spelled out the job of the comforter in verses 8-15, where among other things, He explains that the Comforter part of the Holy Spirit would receive of Him and hence speak as it would come from Him. The summary is in verse 8,And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment
. The comforter's job was (i) to convince people of what is sinful - the bad, (ii) what is good character/righteousness - the good, and (iii) that there is a judgement rewarding good or bad accordingly. The world did not believe Christ about His Law and so the comforter would do the convincing (sin is the transgression of the Law [I John 3:4]). It will have to convince the world of what is the right way to live because He will not be there to do it. It will have to convince the world that there will be a judgement (rewards for good or evil) because even the prince of this world has had to face judgement. The Holy spirit will guide them into truth (thy word is truth [John 17:17]) because they would need knowledge and understanding which the Holy Spirit would help them recall. The comforter would do all of these things so the comforter was critical to Pentecost. But the comforter did more and was required before Pentecost. At Pentecost the comforter was given additional authority which we will discuss in a while.
Baptism of the Holy Ghost AND baptism of fire
John and Christ had different types of baptism.
Baptism in the name of Holy Ghost is done by all servants of God. Baptism of fire and with the Holy Ghost seems to be different.
Is baptism in the name of the Holy Ghost the same as baptism with the Holy Ghost? It does not appear to be the same to me. What John was saying was prophetic and would not happen for many years to come. John was talking of the Kingdom of God when we will be raised to immortality. Baptism is a metaphor for death.
Baptism of the Spirit and of fire appears to be when we become immortal but is now only done as an earnest. Consider panning for gold where the Holy Spirit is water and smelting by fire to be refined. On the other hand humans can be filled with the HS as much as we can handle, like John. The Holy Spirit is what produces the fruit. With no Holy Spirit there is no fruit worthy of repentance and hence no forgiveness.
The spirit that you have determines your future. If you refuse the Holy Spirit then your future is damnation.
There is no question that people have been receiving the Holy Spirit before Pentecost.
The Holy Spirit is not static. It depends on things that we do not completely understand but includes how prepared our heart is to accept it. When was this to happen?
God does not hold off giving us an earnest (down payment) of the Holy Spirit but the real thing that I understand to be baptism with the Holy Spirit and with fire comes at the Resurrection.
The promise of the Father
What was this promise that Luke wrote about?
many people believe that it was the comforter and scriptures such as these are given in support of that.
But take another look at what Luke said in context.
The promise seems to be what was written. What was written had to do with preaching the Gospel starting at Jerusalem. That is what they were reminded of in Acts.
Luke did not write about the comforter. It was John. The promise in Acts must be something that Luke was aware of and had previously written. Up to that point what they had was the same as others were given all through the Old Testament. They were now to be given something special that was not available before. The power to preach the Gospel to the world. The Holy Spirit and eternal life was already given. Consider the story of the thief on the cross, John the Baptist's father Zechariah, and also his mother Elizabeth, prophetess named Anna (notice that she was a prophetess) John the Baptist himself and so on? When did the Holy Spirit stop to restart? It is also hinted at in John.
Let us read more of what Luke actually said in context.
Verse 8 says that they were to receive power, not the Holy Spirit. They already had that. If you think otherwise then the first question that I want to ask is from Acts 1:2. How did Christ give commandments unto the apostles whom he had chosen
. Was the Holy Ghost around at that time? But they had to wait for the Holy Ghost to come upon
them as recorded in verse 8. It did not say receive for the first time, it says come upon. From Old Testament time the Holy Spirit came upon people like Balaam so that he prophesied. The Holy Spirit came upon Othniel (Judges 3:9-10), Gideon (Judges 6:34), Epitaph (Judges 11:29) and Samson (Judges 13:25; 14:6, 19; 15:14). It also came upon seventy people as far back as Numbers (Numbers 11:25) and the same thing happened when the apostles received power. Ezekiel obviously had the Holy Spirit but we see times when it came upon him and gave him power (Ezekiel 2:2, Ezekiel 3:24). I could cite others. Why is it considered to be so strange in Acts 2 or when Christ told His disciples to wait for power from the Holy Spirit? It is the same thing that happened to Philip in Acts 8:39, when he was taken away from the eunuch. It does not mean that you do not have the Holy Spirit before or that you will have it after.
It is obvious that when we read of the Holy Spirit we are reading of different things at different stages.
The HS is the earnest. Was that given?
The HS was the source of supernatural power. Was that given?
The HS was the comforter. Was that given?
What was given at Pentecost and what does given
mean? As I see it one thing that was given was the ability to pass the HS to others i.e. it flowed from them. It was now theirs to give. They were given power not initial use of the Holy Spirit. Before that they could only receive the HS but now they could extend the family by giving it. Giving life is a feature of a marriage. That union takes place at Pentecost. This ability to produce based on the relationship is what was ascribed to Mary and Joseph before their actual marriage. The betrothal was sufficient to legally produce seed.
John spoke of the comforter but the comforter was given soon after the Resurrection. The Comforter is the Holy Spirit but is the Holy Spirit the comforter? No. The Holy Spirit goes beyond comforting but comforting was added in the New Testament. Notice what John said:
If you look at Job, he had no comforter (Job 16:2) or advocate because he was pleading to represent himself (Job 9; 13; 16:21). Comforting is a feature of the Holy Spirit that was added by Christ after the resurrection. Job never had it.
I submit that the promise of the Father was not the Holy Spirit but was assisted by the Holy Spirit. It was the power to spread the Gospel and share the Holy Spirit, features of the Holy Spirit available only after the marriage to the Church.
He could not fully comfort a wife before marriage. Some elements of comforting are reserved for marriage.
growth and development
It is that side of marriage that we see in the disciples in Acts 2. The disciples were all hand picked by Christ and were drawn directly by the Father. Now the power is given to the disciples as was picked up by Matthew.
If you go back to Matthew 18:3 you will see that Christ was talking about the Kingdom of Heaven. He was telling His disciples about how to get there. He talked about saving and going after lost sheep. At the end of the conversation He revealed that they already had tremendous power. That is the power that they were promised in Matthew 16. By Matthew 18 they already had power to decide who was or was not a part of the Church. Christ said that he would be in their midst and the only way that he could do that is by the Holy Spirit. Maybe that is what people mean by the Holy Spirit working with others but the change that was taking place inside them was the Holy Spirit. Calling people was something that Christ formerly reserved for Himself but He was now shifting the job to His disciples. It started in Matthew 4:19 where He promised to make them fishers of men. By Matthew 28 Christ now had all power. He could now give them full power in His name and that is what he did.
John picks up part on the final process for preparing them for the work. John 15:4-5 said that they were expected to bear fruit (marriage and church). By John 21 they were ready but they needed direction. Peter decided to go fishing but the job was to be a fisher of men. Christ appeared and He asked them if they caught anything and they said no. He told them were to let down the nets and they caught a bounty. He then impressed upon Peter what his coming role was. By Acts 2 Peter was ready. He knew that he had to take the lead when the signal came. The signal was to become a fisher of men not a fisherman as he said he was going back to. Luke said that they had to wait on a signal (Luke 24:49) where they would be clothed with the Spirit not receive it for the first time. Now through their preaching the Church is to be extended. Through their actions people are exposed to the truth and drawn to Christ and they are many more than Christ did directly. The disciples had been growing in the power of the Holy Spirit all along.
Romans 8 says that this tremendous growth could not take place without the Holy Spirit in them. It is the only way that we are converted and grow. let us pick up some from verse 4.
There had to be a spiritual change in the minds of the disciples not just with them. People know Romans 8:7 by heart but it is frightening how we are able to forget what we know and what is obvious when we are bamboozled by spiritual sounding rhetoric. You cannot grow spiritually without the Holy Spirit full stop. The disciples grew spiritually hence they had the Holy Spirit. They got additional power to be fishermen and cause the Church to bear fruit.