
The term rationalization provides a clue to managing the problem of making excuses. When we provide a reason for making a choice what we want to be able to state is that we have examined all of the options and have chosen the most rational alternative. In order to do that we must be able to list and assign a true weight to each of the options. Therein lies the first problem. Can we identify all of the options and can we assign a true weight (level of importance) to each? It is only after we have done that, that we can honestly state that we have identified the correct choice. After we have identified it then it is a matter of strength of character i.e. cowardice or frugality.
Rationalization (making excuses)
The coward reckons himself cautious; the miser thinks himself frugal
.Henry Home
Cowardice or frugality relates to whether or not we take care of things that fall into the category of things that we can control. If we shy away from things that we can control that is cowardice and if we avoid things that are beyond us that is frugality. Again God makes a difference. We can contrast David with Aaron. David killed a lion and a bear building up to killing Goliath. Aaron claimed that he threw the jewelry in the fire and a golden calf came out.
The Bible is a great help in all the required areas. A sound knowledge of the Bible helps us to see options that we might have missed and helps us to assign a weight. I believe that the weight from the Bible is the best possible because it comes from God and relates to eternity. If we go a step further then a relationship with God opens up options that are only available by the Holy Spirit. Of course a relationship with Satan opens up devilish options but the same Bible helps us to assign a true weight to those.
Rationalization is so common that it goes way back in literature
This is the excellent foppery of the world, that,when we are sick in fortune, often the surfeit of our own behavior, we make guilty of our disasters the sun, the moon, and the stars: as if we were villains by necessity; fools by heavenly compulsion; knaves, thieves, and treachers, by spherical predominance; drunkards, liars, and adulterers, by an enforced obedience of planetary influence; and all that we are evil in, by a divine thrusting on: an admirable evasion of whoremaster man, to lay his goatish disposition to the charge of a star!William Shakespeare King Lear, act 1, scene 2, Edmund
Wikipedia gives an eye-opening definition of rationalization
In psychology and logic, rationalization or rationalisation (also known as making excuses)[1] is a defense mechanism in which controversial behaviors or feelings are justified and explained in a seemingly rational or logical manner to avoid the true explanation, and are made consciously tolerable—or even admirable and superior—by plausible means.[2] It is also an informal fallacy of reasoning.[3]Wikipedia Rationalization (psychology)Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia WEB18:47, 31 August 2020
Rationalization is a defense mechanism. As a result we rationalize to ourselves and we also have an almost irresistible urge to rationalize to other people, even those we do not know. It is usually a response to something that we have done ourselves, such as being unkind to another person but it may also be used to defend something or someone to whom we are attached, such as when a friend is unkind to us. It comes from fear so at the root of rationalization is getting rid of fear in ourselves and in others. If there is no threat there is no need to rationalize.
This brings us down to the fundamentals of rationalism: avoiding or shifting responsibility. That is actually how we are able to identify what is a reason and what is an excuse. An excuse is an attempt to shift blame to someone or something else. A reason is an admission of our culpability and is usually accompanied by a plan to avoid failure in the future. With reason we take responsibility for our behaviors and our decisions that contributed to the failure and establish a plan to control them in the future. God can transform excuses into reasons in several ways. The first is that I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me
, Philippians 4:13 [KJV]. That dispenses with excuses and leaves us with asking for wisdom as instructed by James and moving forward in faith.
James 1:5-8 KJV If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him. 6 But let him ask in faith, nothing wavering. For he that wavereth is like a wave of the sea driven with the wind and tossed. 7 For let not that man think that he shall receive any thing of the Lord. 8 A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.
In another webpage under the subhead Use of rationalization to cover up medical errors
Wikipedia states:
Based on anecdotal and survey evidence, Banja states that rationalization (making excuses) is very common among the medical profession to cover up medical errors.Wikipedia Medical errorWikipedia, the free encyclopedia WEB13:47, 29 August 2020
Common reasons cited for rationalization under these circumstances are:
Why disclose the error? The patient was going to die anyway
Telling the family about the error will only make them feel worse
It was the patient's fault, If he wasn't so (obese, sick etc), this error wouldn't have caused so much harm
Well, we did our best. These things happen
If we're not totally and absolutely certain the error caused the harm, we don't have to tell.
Other examples in general life include:
- A person fails to get good enough results to get into a chosen school or institution and then says that they didn't want to go there anyway or from fairy tales the fox and the sour grapes.
- You accidentally fall over in the street and claim that you have recently been ill.
We may also use it to justify our actions when we know we are wrong. For example:
- A person submits fake claims on his Income Tax and says to himself, Everyone does it.
- In a job application a person lies on their resume to get the interview because as they see it nobody can meet such stringent criteria but if I just meet me Ill prove I'm just right for the job.
For such episodes we immediately provide a false explanation that has a logical ring to it like this very old one.
According to 'Psychology Wiki', rationalization can be traced back thousands of years to Quintilian and classical rhetoric.
However the concept itself (as opposed to the term) can be traced back millennia earlier, to Quintilian and classical rhetoric: 'The "pat excuse" is the color, a frequent technical term among the rhetoricians for any approach that would present an action in the most favourable possible light'.[6] By the eighteenth century, it was almost a commonplace that, were a man to consider his actions, 'he will soon find, that such of them, as strong inclination and custom have prompted him to commit, are generally dressed out and painted with all the false beauties [color] which, a soft and flattering hand can give them'Psychology Wiki Rationalization (defence mechanism)Psychology Wiki WEB2020-09-10
So what are we doing when we are challenged to serve God we think:
- I am already a good person.
- I am too bad. God is not interested in me.
- There are too many hypocrites in the church.
- Church is boring.
- I need to straighten my life out first.
- I'll wait until I get a bit older.
- I don't believe in God or I am not really religious.
- I was born a Christian.
- It is the same God in all religions.
- I can't change.
- There are too many contradictions in the Bible.
- I like my life. I want to have fun.
- I'm too educated or smart to believe the Bible.
- I believe in science not science fiction.
- I will not follow a God who burns people in hell.
So as a Christian, when we find ourselves outmatched by the challenge of our circumstances and buckle instead of remembering Hebrews what are we doing?
All this is not to say that an excuse is not appropriate is some situations but it has to do with priorities. When it comes to sin we must always seek repentance but every situation is not as critical as sin. The only real answer is to see God's heart so that we would know the difference.
Worshiping in your tent door
The rationalisation from the incident with Aaron goes even further. Let us begin with at quotation from Exodus.
Notice that it said that the tabernacle door was outside the camp but everybody worshiped in his tent door
. The relationship between us and God is not fifty-fifty. We can't say well if He is not coming to me I will not go to Him
. The problem is that people do not want to move out of our comfort zone and we let fear petrify us. Golden calves are created when we have a burning issue (burning to us at least) and we cannot see God active in responding to it. We become offended by the situation and seek to solve it the way that we know how instead of the way that God reveals. God has many ways of revealing things but the primary means is instruction in His word. We know that the instruction says do not act in some manner but we do it anyhow.
Israel was warned but they did kot know any other way. The ways that they knew had been learned in Egypt which God pictures as sin. We learn our ways from the world of sin that we grew up in and that is all that we know until God reveals His way. They thought that their issues were more important than what God was dealing with, As they saw it He should have responded to their needs. As it turned out He and Moses were arranging a contract to govern the whole nation and that would impact on all of humanity. The Ten Commandments and the Laws and Statutes that Moses and God were discussing were world changing matters that would go down through their posterity, but they could not see Moses. They included the ways to approach Him and get help in times of adversity and if they had waited just a little longer Moses would have returned.
Remember that when Moses got there He already had the Ten Commandments and so it appears that he was already close to returning. They did not know how close they came to being wiped out completely.
Moses was the instrument of God and they could not see God's instrument active in their lives so they took matters into their own hands just like all the rest of us are prone to do. It never ends well. When we think that we have suffered enough from it there is still the matter of repentance.
The whole of that psalm is relevant but that extract is sufficient for now. We cannot get comfortable after we sin until the relationship is fully restored. To do that God has to renew a right heart in us and for that to happen we must go to Him. We have to sacrifice our comfort and humble ourselves. We have to seek Him and beg Him for help. He does not need us, we need Him. That should be obvious but pride can cloud our judgement. Repentance hurts and it may be a long way back. If you examine the consequences of David and Bathsheba you will see that it almost destroyed his family and that was in spite of deep repentance. No Golden Calves for me!