According to wikipedia, QAnon[a] (/ˌkjuː.əˈnɒn/) is a disproven far-right conspiracy theory alleging that a cabal of Satanic, cannibalistic pedophiles operate a global child sex trafficking ring and conspired against former President Donald Trump during his term in office. QAnon has been described as a cult. . ., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAnon,  QAnon, 09:03, 17 September 2021‎. When people warn of the dangers concerning the COVID19 world pandemic, is it the same thing?

This is one of a series of four articles that I have written dealing with covid-19 in an effort to help people who are searching for some biblical and scientific light in all the madness. I am not sure whether or not the order in which they are read is important but this in the order in which I wrote them:

• Pandemic - No_King_but_Caesar
• Pandemic - Conspiracy_theories
• Pandemic - The Real Conspiracy
• Pandemic - Wonderfully and fearfully made

When people warned of Vollkswagen was it the same thing? When people warned of the global economic collapse was it the same thing? Where are Christians in all of this? When these issues arise are Christians part of the problem or the solution? People claim that Christian fundamentalism (like belief in healing and supernatural protection) and a literal belief in angels and devils are a problem.People claim to know these things because they have all of the evidence.

Christ warned the Sardis Church about this problem. It is how we came to a knowledge of the truth in the first place. Is Christianity a conspiracy theory? How do you know? The warning to Sardis was that they must remember how they came to that knowledge. Basically it was by exploring the truth of a conspiracy theory. The parable of the sower goes on to elaborate and the epistles fill in the approach that we must prove all things and hold fast what is good. That is the key from the Bible. At first even some of the disciples thought that Christ was going to overthrow the then government. They were mistaken but as they pursued the truth and righteousness it became clear. Some people have a knack for looking good and convincing people of their point of view. Is that proof? That is called charisma and it is what people like Hitler and Mussolini had. Satan appears as an angel of light. This is the problem that all Christians face. The only way to deal with it is as the Bible says. Thoroughly examine ALL of the evidence and then check with the Bible to see if God is in it or not. If He is then hold it fast. If He is not it is of Satan and part of his great conspiracy. There is no middle ground. In the pandemic situation that is what Christians must be looking for: Christ. Is He in it or not?

As far as Christianity is concerned then the question of whether or not there is a conspiracy is a moot point. There always will be until Christ comes. The question is are we approaching it biblically and spiritually or carnally? We cannot trust ourselves because our hearts are deceitful but we must live by every word of God. It tells us how to approach things.

Some people claim that the LGBT movement to teach children in school that their gender is something that they can choose and family can be structured anyhow is not a conspiracy. Satan has already removed God from the curriculum and now he is injecting even more evil. It is a conspiracy and it is Satan. The global financial situation has been taken over and power is in the hands of the rich not the elected officials. It is a conspiracy in finance and it is Satan. Something is happening with the WHO and their most recent charter that gives power to the WHO over the national elected officials in cases of health, to dictate law in their countries. Is that Christ or Satan? If Satan is doing it in education and in finance, is it so is it so hard to accept that he is doing it in healthcare? A man in Europe that has not been elected potentially has control of the internal affairs of 194 countries. Is that not a conspiracy? Is it open and public and godly in its approach? The list of ungodly practices supported by the global COVID strategy is long but just consider this: when you attack churchgoers that choose to believe God and His promises for healing and protection instead of a man in Europe and his UNPROVEN theory about a vaccination trial, is that God or is it Satan? Are those who support it supporting God? The only alternative is Satan. When you look to the Bible the lines are drawn and the only question then become how exactly is he doing it?

WHAT SATAN IS LIKE IN CHARACTER

Satan will trick us if we do not stick to what God says. The old trick that questions the integrity of God can be phrased in many ways. In covid it is often challenging our faith that God is interested in healing and protecting us. Should we even bother to consult Him? I believe that a fair assessment of their claim is that God has unleashed a plague on humanity without cause and the only escape is the one provided by WHO and the vaccine industry. The healthcare people have it all under control. Remember the Gibeonites. Look at how Satan did it with Christ in the Temptations.

We see this in some people. Satan knew that Christ was the Son of God but he wanted Christ to prove it to him. He wanted Christ to show off and sin. He was a provoker. He used disdainful words to provoke Christ while he could technically say that he did nothing wrong. You can judge if you have ever seen people do this. Christ countered by saying that He had nothing to prove. His job was to worship and serve God. An evil and adulterous generation always wants somebody else to give a sign, but that is for each individual to seek in God through our own prayer and study just like the Bereans. Notice also that Satan said that he had the world under his control. There is definitely a conspiracy.

God is in things like healing and fellowship and the Sabbath and greeting each other with a brotherly kiss etc. Some people do not savour those things and would want us to be just like them. Be comfortable with lockdowns and the vaccine and not savour the things of God instead.

In the COVID19 protocol people lied about it being lawful to force people to take an untested vaccine. Many people did it out of fear of those ungodly and unlawful lies and threats. Some lied overtly and some by siding with the liars. Some people committed murder. They gave people the jab without proper counsel and support especially with regard to blood clots and so the people went home and died. It is murder. They lied about it being safe because it is still a trial and the results will not be out until 2022. There is no God in that however you swing it. Simple.

There are things that God makes clear and simple. You are a liar and a murderer if you support the COVID19 protocol, if that protocol claims to know that something is safe when, according to your own international standards, the results are not yet in. You are a murderer if you know that there is a safe treatment, whether or not you are certain about its effectiveness, and you refuse to provide it and people die as a result. You are an oppressor if you insist that people expose themselves to something that is harmful when it is against the law and you skirt around it by repeatedly invoking inappropriate rules. People want to water these things down and beguile us. Keeping the Sabbath is a priority. Not bearing false witness is a priority. They are in the Ten Commandments. Loving God comes first, then loving neighbour, but some of these people want to subtly reverse that.

Plain and simple. When you twist the truth you are a minister of Satan.

There are people who look good or make us feel good but that is not what Christians are supposed to look for. Their works are the issue. Do their works conform to the standard that God has set? We live by God's word not our feelings and emotions.

In seeking to see if there is a conspiracy and who is behind it we can apply principles like these to find Satan. Where he is there is conspiracy. It does not mean that the people in the conspiracy know. The people who claimed no king but Caesar did not know. Peter did not know. We have to use the Holy Spirit and God's word to see and know, not look for these people or anybody else to give us a sign. The signs are already there, we just don't want to accept them.

SATAN IS AT WORK RIGHT NOW, TODAY

It is probably best to start by making that clear.

The majority lie in wickedness. That has to be the fundamental understanding that a Christian has of this world. Most of the people who take the jab are victims. They have responded out of fear with little understanding of the protocol because that has been devised at a higher level. The protocol insists that the whole world must have the experimental jab and that there is no other efficient and effective way to control the disease. The Bible says that there is another way, by prayer and fasting, so from a Christian perspective It is wickedness if you have not even tried it and claim that God is wrong.

He has access to knowledge that we do not and is always way ahead of us. Could that be happening with Christians today and with covid?

His job is to oppose Christ. He does not stop. If we can't see him just know that he is still there. It is just that we can't see.

The approach of the world, his people, does not change.

Satan and his demons will find some poor sap to help them do their dirty work.

Christ is not a liar. Is the COVID protocol right?

The poor saps that they use are expendable. When their actions are brought to light there will be no help from Satan.

God is no liar. He can take care of us if we trust in Him. The Satanic world cannot conquer us if we remain true to God.

Sin means breaking God's law, His commandments. If we rebelliously sin we are like Satan. God can destroy Satan's works and that is his whole purpose in the world.

Satan will use anything to get between a family even the very thing that caused the family in the first place. His devices are especially directed at the Church.

If people break God's law we must point it out to them so that they can repent. If we do not and they have problems then we are guilty before God. If we misguide them we are also guilty before God. Have you ever read Psalm 10? Does it not sound familiar when you look around?

People are blinded and Christians must be the light.

Satan is able to blind people as part of his conspiracy. Some are so blind that they claim that there is no conspiracy. If people prevent others from continuing their education or employment by unethically restricting them then they have robbed those people and God's law says that we should not steal. If we dishonour our parents by giving them something that wil harm them we have perverted God's law to honour our parents. If we covet other people's freedom to chose and want to harm them because they will not use it in compliance with us we break God's commandments. If we support and encourage people that do these things then we are guilty. When Jezebel killed Naboth in 1 Kings 21 who did God call to account?

God helps us to understand all things because we are supposed to prove them and hold onto what is true. Some people want to censor what we understand. Satan can use his people to snatch the truth from the minds of people before they can fully comprehend it.

The people that oppress us want to see a sign. They want us, or God Himself, to show off and try to impress them. That is Satan again.

it is very straighforward. Do what the Bible says.

NOTE THE FIRST THING IS TRUTH!

There is a conspiracy and a war and anybody who tries to tell you different is a liar. The whole world is involved in the conspiracy even though many are unaware of their participation.

Satan can manipulate most people at will

He uses some people to prevent others from hearing the truth.

Blasphemy is defined as the act or offense of speaking sacrilegiously about God or sacred things; profane talk. People speak sacrilegiously of God in relation to covid by defaming those who are fundamental Christians and threatening God's people in the name of God. God stands by His word. You cannot curse God's people for serving and obeying Him while claiming that you are doing it in God's name.

Whatever nonsense people try to tell us there is a man of sin to be revealed. There is mysterious work being done. We have to look for him as a sign. The Bible tells us that there will be a falling away and when that comes we can see him but only if we love the truth. We have to keep our eyes peeled. Has there been a falling away? We do not know when the final one will be so we keep looking.

Submit to what God says. That is our only escape.

So anybody who tells us that there is no conspiracy and it is all well in hand is a liar. Satan is out to get us.

The technical part

The remainder of this article is technical. I go into this so that readers can consider my understanding of the true science behind it and some of the business decisions being made. I do not pretend to have perfect answers just questions that I believe should be clarified to the public. It is intended to act as a base for research on the subject not to be authoritative.

I have watched several videos by Dr. Carrie Madej and I have read several pieces that claim that what she has explained is false but in my opinion, if her evidence is weak then the evidence that the opponents provide is baseless and they have taken much of what she actually said out of context. I urge you to see the whole interview with Kamalpreet Singh and logically scrutinise what she actually claims. One of the things that she has claimed and that nobody that I have read has attempted to refute concerns PFIZER research and the antibiotic azithromycin. What she claims about that is that they were threatened with reprisals if they attempted to reveal what they learned was the true motivation behind stopping the trials.

if you read Live Oral Bacteria Found In Arterial Plaque, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/03/050329134246.htm, Date: March 31, 2005, Source: University Of Florida, You will see that there is that kind of research with findings similar to what she has claimed.

I will go through a list of claims that she has made as I understand them. They are not quotations, just my understanding and they raise concerns that I do not feel comfortable with.

Dr. Carrie Madej

[DEFINITION OF A PANDEMIC]

The global death rate has remained unchanged, what has changed is the definition of pandemic.

is she lying or summarising? It appears to me that she is summarising by showing that the pandemic is not extraordinary but typical of seasonal statistics as far as the death rate is concerned. I could not find data to either refute or substantiate this. Some evidence can be misleading. For example the chart on the Excess mortality during the Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), webpage https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid may well be accurate but is is not a comparison with the projected trend just with the historical average. What you really need is a comparison with what would be expected under normal circumstances if the historical trend continues.

According to WHO

A pandemic is defined as an epidemic occurring worldwide, or over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries and usually affecting a large number of people.2 The classical definition includes nothing about population immunity, virology or disease severity. By this definition, pandemics can be said to occur annually in each of the temperate southern and northern hemispheres, given that seasonal epidemics cross international boundaries and affect a large number of people. However, seasonal epidemics are not considered pandemics. . ."

WHOBulletin of the World Health Organization 2011;89:540-541. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.088815WEB

The "DOSHI" mentioned in the WHO bulletin refers to an article written by Peter Doshi https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/89/7/11-089508.pdf in which he claims that the WHO definition is basically useless. The WHO bulletin attempts to discredit his claims. The historical definition recognised by almost everyone before 2009 automatically sets the bar higher than the seasonal flu. Other sources claim that before 2009 (the controversial year used by Doshi) it had to do with 1.. a worldwide disease, 2.. number of sick being abnormally high, 3.. number of deaths being abnormally high. This was the accepted definition even by the WHO before 2009. Now WHO have cut out the last two and many claim it was an attempt to cause panic.

There is a deep controversy and basically the defense of WHO is that they never changed any definition because they hever had a definition before just a description, see https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3127275/. I became very disappointed because I considered Which is more dangerous, a person who tells an outright lie or a person who plays around with words? Suppose you described a dog for centuries as having five characteristics: a bark, a tail, four legs, non-retractable paws and fur. Then someone defines a dog as a creature with fur that barks. What would you say about that person? Just so that we are all on the same page: not only dogs, but deer, monkeys and birds bark.

The danger with WHO is the binding nature of the commitment to the health regulations by member states. As I understand it the current agreement came out in 2014 with effect from 2016. The charter is signed by 194 member states and it is embedded in the constitution of WHO that they (the 194) must comply with the health regulations, they do not have to adopt it, it is immediately binding. It means that the Director General can unilaterally decide what a country must do with regards to things like vaccines regardless of what anybody says. In that case it would be a global dictatorship run by an agency. The only two countries that rejected the commitment were the USA and Iran. Bill Gates requested to be a member of the executive board like a member state. It was considered and rejected officially by vote but unofficially he has extraordinary status.

Dr. Carrie Madej

[DEATH RATE]

Just dying with COVID is considered as dying from COVID. The PCR test was not designed for diagnosis. It gives false positives up to double the true results. It is a screening measure and the real test would have to be done to confirm.

In addition a PCR of more than 25 cycles is considered by many to be inconclusive (You can check the recommendation of the inventor Kary Mullis. The cutoff point for a positive result for COVID lab tests is 38 cycles or more. He warns that in excess cycles the PCR test can tell you that almost anything is there because it can amplify things that exist in amounts that are too small to be reasonably considered as evidence.

Dr. Carrie Madej

Monetary incentive:

Giving the diagnosis as COVID 19 nets $2,000 more per patient. If a patient is put on a ventilator they net $13,000 - 16,000 more per person. Other things cause more money to pile up.

Dr. Carrie Madej

Fear:

There is pressure on doctors in hospitals to put COVID 19 as diagnosis. This drives up the statistics in America.

Dr. Carrie Madej

CONTAMINATION (INFECTION) RATES

These have little material significance. In addition some of the tests were already contaminated. It is known that at least two batches from the CDC alone were contaminated and nobody knows how many others were. The measures that are in place are screening measures not diagnostic measures.

This says to me that a person who died of kidney failure but had covid 19 maybe as a complication is now considered a covid 19 death.

Now let us deal more closely with Mortality Rate and Infection Rate and herd immunity. First let me say that rates calculated by using PCR tests are invalid according to the definitions of these things, and should not even be published. PCR tests are not accurate enough to be used in any official rates.

HERD IMMUNITY

Herd immunity to a disease occurs when a large portion of a society (the herd) becomes immune, thus making the spread of the disease from one person to another unlikely. The whole society therefore becomes protected not just those who are immune.

It is highly desirable to have a high incidence of infections in the part of the society in which mortality is unlikely because that means that herd immunity develops quickly, since even if those people become incapacitated it is temporary, and they are in no danger of dying. people who are complaining when there are high infection rates but low mortality rates completely misunderstand the issue.

For example, if 80% of a population is immune to a virus, four out of every five people who we encounter wont be infected and hence could not pass it to us. Depending how contagious an infection is, usually 50% to 90% of a population needs immunity before infection rates start to decline. The risk of mortality is the combined probability of contact times the rate of infection times the rate of mortality. The risk of infections depends on the individual's immune system. The effective herd immunity depends on the distribution of the disease in the community. For example if the 80% immune is among the active population then the overall risk is lowered because the percentage of immune among them automatically is higher and you are more likely to encounter an active person by default. THe herd immunity for covid19 is unknown.

For example, if 80% of a population is immune to a virus, four out of every five people who we encounter won’t be infected and hence could not pass it to us. Depending how contagious an infection is, usually 50% to 90% of a population needs immunity before infection rates start to decline. When it declines to zero we are at herd immunity. The risk of mortality is the combined probability of contact with an infected person and catching the disease, times the rate of mortality. The risk contact with an infected person and catching the disease is the infection rate. The risk of infection, in spite of the infection rate, depends on the individual's immune system. If the person has a robust enough immune system then they stand no chance of catching the disease even when in contact with a contagious person. In the case of covid this is what drugs like ivermectin purports to do to some large degree but it can also be acquired just as effectively with the right diet and exposure to sun and fresh air. The effective herd immunity depends on the distribution of the disease in the community. For example if the 80% immune is among the active population with robust immune systems then the overall risk is lower because that group is the one most likely to transmit it from place to place by virtue of being active but at the same time more of them are immune or have high resistance by virtue of their robust immune systems. The herd immunity for covid19 is unknown. All of this is why it is highly desirable to have high activity in groups with very robust immune systems when the risk of mortality is very low, especially if there is no serious consideration for lack of productivity from being incapacitated by the disease.

In the present situation with covid19 there are several additional methods deemed appropriate to improve the risk of infection. Reducing the risk of infection is not the primary goal but reducing the risk of mortality. Infection has more to do with the loss of productivity. Masks for example are debatable and I have found no scientific evidence to support their use in protecting an individual form catching the disease, however their use is encouraged for reducing the spread of particles generated by speaking. Many masks are said to contain harmful substances from the manufacturing process. Some claim that the use of masks weakens the immune system and opens us up for infection and hence undermines the effect of herd immunity. In my opinion the truth is that prolonged use of masks has undesirable effects and it is not being made clear to people what the opposing objectives are: do not spread particles but get fresh air and sunlight.

In the cases of a true vaccine, herd immunity from the vaccine is equal to herd immunity due to infection. This is not the case with the covid19 synthetic mRNA trials. Some people claim that it is superior to true vaccines by their actions because they insist that it is necessary even if you have recently recovered from covid19. In my opinion that is just ridiculous. On the other hand I have found more evidence that it is inferior inferior and some claim vastly inferior because of the mechanism used by the jab. Yet people who have been infected are encouraged to also subject themselves to the risk of an experimental synthetic mRNA therapy. To me an act like that can only undermine the herd immunity since you now expose the already immune person to the effects of the unproven technology.

MORTALITY RATE

I have found the explanation on worldometers site to be very useful https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-rate/

After reading all of the information on the website it is clear that the real mortality rate is unknown. Estimates of around 3% were provided with caution. The rate of 4% that the WHO presented is now understood by The UKs chief medical officer, Chris Whitty (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/coronavirus-recovery-what-happens-after-covid19/ ) to be inaccurate and the true rate more like 1%.

According to worldometers site

When calculating the mortality rate, we need:

1. The number of actual cases. We need to know the number of actual cases (not merely the reported ones, which are typically only a small portion of the actual ones) that have already had an outcome (positive or negative: recovery or death), not the current cases that still have to be resolved (the case sample shall contain zero active cases and include only "closed" cases).
2. The number of actual deaths related to the closed cases examined above.

Considering that a large number of cases are asymptomatic (or present with very mild symptoms) and that testing has not been performed on the entire population, only a fraction of the SARS-CoV-2 infected population is detected, confirmed through a laboratory test, and officially reported as a COVID-19 case. The number of actual cases is therefore estimated to be at several multiples above the number of reported cases. The number of deaths also tends to be underestimated, as some patients are not hospitalized and not tested.

If we base our calculation (deaths / cases) on the number of reported cases (rather than on the actual ones), we will greatly overestimate the fatality rate. . .

worldometers.infoCoronavirus (COVID-19) Mortality Rateworldometers.infoWEBLast updated: May 14, 22:00 GMT

The formula that they were using in China at the time was CUMULATIVE current total deaths / current confirmed cases. The formula used was 425/20,438. Based on this figure, the national mortality rate to date was 2.1% of CONFIRMED CASES. People use different rates and some rates are stated in k which I will explain later. Also notice that mortality rates are calculated based on known sick people not on all the people in the population area or on a guess from a PCR test. In the Chinese case there was terrible fear and draconian measures making it highly likely that people who had mild cases of the disease did not report it voluntarily. I have no evidence that the whole population was tested and I do not believe that they were since testing kits were not readily available. This makes it very probable that the chinese figure is high.

INFECTION RATE

To me this was more difficult to tie down. In contrast to mortality rates, infection rates are based on the entire population. Infection rates will be different as you get closer to the herd immunity. Early infection rates are normally higher. It is the worst case situation. Giving people the impression that it is a constant is dishonest. The other thing that I observe is that the method of calculation is not ever what most people seem to think that it is. Try the information on https://covidactnow.org/covid-risk-levels-metrics.

Sources and methodology from https://ethics.harvard.edu/files/center-for-ethics/files/key_metrics_and_indicators_v4.pdf

If you are basing your methodology on Harvard you can use daily new cases number as a seven-day average, and divide by every 100K people in a location. For instance, if a location has 200K (200,000) people, we would divide the daily new cases by two:

Daily new cases metric calculation per 100k population = New daily cases average over last seven days / (population /100k)

It is not a constant and it should drop steadily but it will also have spikes. If you project a spike as THE RATE then you are being deceitful.

THE RISK OF MORTALITY

The risk of mortality is derived from taking both the Mortality and Infection rates into consideration AND IT IS NOT STATIC. It changes daily. The risk of mortality is the risk of getting the infection times the risk of dying once infected. It is low and in the case of young healthy people, ridiculously low. The problem I find is that websites do not give that information directly. First it is sometimes given in k (e.g. they assume that you understand that 2% means 2/100,000) and then you cannot even find risk of mortality by age. I had to find an infection rate and work it out. An explanation of the difficulty is given on https://ourworldindata.org/mortality-risk-covid. The Case Fatality Rate (CFR) is what I called the Mortality Rate and it varies from place to place. The other thing that is given is Infection Fatality rate (IFR) but that is not what people think that it is either. It is not the risk of mortality. Lets say the seven day average in Wonderland is 23. The rate in K (not 100k as recommended by Harvard) is 23/300 = .0767 since we have 300,000 people in Wonderland. That rate can be expressed as about 7% but that is not 7 out of 100 it is 7 out of 100,000 because it is given in k. Then you have to multiply that by the mortality rate. Let us say that is 2.1% in k. 2.1% x 7% = 14.7 / 10,000 because 100x100=10,000. That gives .00147 or 0.147% and that is in k. So that is really saying 0.147 out of 100,000 chance of dying which is what people actually want to know. People are given these rates without explanation and it is frightening them, but if they look around they will see that what they assume from the rates cannot be true.

what is a PCR test

Something else that frightens people is the results from PCR tests. The acronym PCR testing is short for  polymerase chain reaction testing.

A chain reaction means that is proceeds in an exponential fashion, i.e. from one we get two, from two we get four(2²), from four we get sixteen (4²) and so on. Polymerase is the enzyme that causes the chain reaction.

PCR amplifies a specific region of a DNA strand (the DNA target). Most PCR methods amplify DNA fragments of between 0.1 and 10 kilo base pairs (kbp) in length. A kilobase pair (kbp) is a unit of length of nucleic acids, equal to 1000 base pairs. It is very small since it is being measured in the units of the helix (or ladder) of a piece of DNA.

Lets look at some things that are important to understand. One is from https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/antisense.

Antisense is a term that's used to describe one of the two strands of DNA, or actually in some cases also RNA. If you imagine that there's a directional way that you read information from what's called the five prime, or the front end, to the three prime, or the back end, that's unidirectional. You can't read DNA or RNA in both directions, and so there's a sense strand for DNA, and then there's a second strand of DNA which is called the antisense strand. The sense strand has the information that would be readable on the RNA (single strand), and that's called the coding side. The antisense is the non-coding strand, but ironically, when you're making RNA, the proteins that are involved in making RNA read the antisense strand in order to create a sense strand for the mRNA. There's a second aspect of antisense, which is a fairly new discovery, called antisense RNA. These are RNAs that read in the opposite direction of the coding strand, and they actually bind to the coding strand of mRNAs and either target them for destruction or prevent them from being expressed. It's sort of a new way of gene regulation that's recently been developed.

Shawn Burgess, Ph.D. Antisensewww.genome.govWEB2021-09-26

Let us see what you need to do a PCR test. You need:

A DNA template

A PRIMER

Denaturing

Annealing

Two DNA primers

A DNA polymerase;

Deoxynucleoside triphosphates

A NUCLEOTIDE

A NUCLEOSIDE

NUCLEOSIDE TRIPHOSPHATES (NTPs)

So basically

1..you isolate the region that you want by using a template (what you think that the relevant DNA looks like) and primers to mark where to begin replication on that template.

2..You split the DNA template and stick the primer to the starting point if there is a match.

3..You use the enzyme to continue extending the strand that the the primer started to make.

4.. You stop the process when the strand is long enough and repeat the cycle until you have enough.

PCR testing is used to tell us if someone currently has COVID-19. This is in contrast to serology testing for example, which tests someone's blood to see if they have generated antibodies in response to COVID-19 infection. Antibody or serology tests look for antibodies in your blood that fight the virus that causes COVID-19. The downside of Antibody tests to diagnose a current infection of COVID-19 is that an antibody test will not show that you have the infection until your body begins to produce antibodies and that can take 1 to 3 weeks by which time you may spread it. A 2020 study in Nature Medicine reports that, of the 285 study participants who required hospitalization for severe COVID-19, all developed SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies within 19 days of symptom onset. There are other options. Antigen and Molecular Tests are Diagnostic tests are a general class of tests. Diagnostic tests can be antigen based (“rapid antigen” tests), which look for protein markers on the outside of the virus, or they can be molecular based (including PCR, LAMP, CRISPR), which look for viral genomic material specific to SARS-CoV-2.

In PCR testing chemicals (referred to as reagents) and equipment are used to extract the genetic material from the sample of a candidate collected on a swab.

The extracted material is then placed into a tube which contains another set of reagents.

That tube is placed in a machine that can run tests on many tubes at once. This machine enables the PCR reaction to make millions of copies of a piece of the viral DNA. This process is called amplification.

This amplification process allows even a small amount of virus to be detected if it is present in the sample.

If the piece of DNA cannot be copied, there is no virus in the sample, or there is such a low amount that even this very sensitive test cannot detect it.

So with the PCR test it has a virus sample of something to look for and it looks for a match in the sample given to it from the donor. If it finds a match it duplicates it to the point where it can be detected by instruments but is it flawless or are there errors that can lead to false positives or negatives? How many duplicating cycles are considered the maximum to produce very good quality results?

consider the answer at https://fullfact.org/health/cycle-threshold-values/

The true answer seems to be that nobody knows and people are playing with words to justify their position. The claim that PCR tests give false positives and gives more false positives at higher cycles appears to be true. The assertion that the reliability of PCR tests depend on other conditions appears to be true. The exact relationship is unknown so anyone who claims that their results are guaranteed is lying. PCR tests may be useful but not sufficient. The degree of certainty seems to be unknown or at least unspecified but people are treating positive tests like absolutes.

NO FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN MEDICINE

WHY RESEARCH ON AZITHROMYCIN STOPPED

Antibiotics are antimicrobial drugs of chemical origin that treat and prevent bacterial infections by either killing or inhibiting the growth of the bacteria (Waksman 1947). Macrolides (a class of chemicals that are formed from a mollecular ring), such as azithromycin have been the primary antibiotic class used to investigate the effects of antibiotics as secondary prevention in people with coronary heart disease. There are concerns with the use of azithromycin but Dr. Carrie Madej says that she was part of a research team that investigated its use in heart disease and the research was halted because azithromycin looked like it could cure the disease rather than just control it. If that is true can you depend on these people to provide you with the best alternative or just the most profitable alternative?

IS IVERMECTIN UNSAFE

If the COVID vaccines are safe why is Ivermectin unsafe? What yardstick was there that made the Operation Warp Speed project reject Ivermectin and include only synthetic mRNA?

If the vaccines are worthy of the billions of dollars being invested why is Ivermectin not getting similar attention?

If the trials for covid can be allowed to be mainstream for the sake of pursuing a cure, why is there no similar treatment of Ivermectin and variants?

Why can't the trials for Ivermectin-Azithromycin-Cholecalciferol (IvAzCol) Combination Therapy for COVID-19 (IvAzCol) get more support? see https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04399746. At the same time millions are getting the jab and there is continual and continuous propaganda to support it.

I have seen several sites attempting to justify their positions by claiming that they knew from the science that mRNA was safe. The way that we know anything from science as far as I know is by testing, before that it is a hypothesis or an experiment. When these people therefore say that they know I presume that they are dealing with the supernatural or are bordering on lunacy. Only a lunatic would know that something that could be hot is cool before testing it because he might have heard a voice.

VACCINES - THEORY AND INGREDIENTS

true vaccines:

You acquire a dead or weakened sample of the antibody. it is mixed with chemicals to weaken or inhibit the virus and injected. The theory is that the body recognises the virus and learns to destroy it.

In the case of covid:

Dr. Carrie Madej

They never had the virus organism on file. Were never able to isolate the whole virus. From pieces of genetic material of sick patients they used a computer to fill in the blanks and compose a possible structure. Then scientists agreed on the structure that they concocted. The assumption was that the computer code was accurate and that the pieces were the pieces from COVID 19.

This has never happened in the history of humanity. It is a synthetic recombinant gene therapy. Recombinant DNA is when a DNA is created from pieces. Synthetic gene means that it is not natural but fabricated. We are putting this in people's bodies. They are using Solid lipid nanoparticles as a delivery mechanism. If the synthetic gene is injected into the body on its one the body will attack and destroy it so the wrapping of the lipid is to fool the body into allowing the gene through. The cell allows the code into the cell. The cell reads it and begins reproducing the artificial virus. Nobody knows how long it will continue because there is no off button.

ANIMAL STUDIES

Dr. Carrie Madej

In the last 20 years ALL animal studies with this same virus (because it is not a new virus) and the same vaccine have failed. The body did not react normally. When the body saw the virus IN THE FUTURE the body had an exaggerated response and began to attack itself. Many of the animals eventually died.

It certainly is not a new virus ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749647/ ) but I do not have evidence on the various animal trials and I do not know which trials she was referring to. Most people who contradict the statement refer to evidence from 2003, 2004 and 2012 studies but I do not know if these are the same ones that Carrie Madej is referring to.

Scary terms being used

What does lipid mean?

Any of a class of organic compounds that are fatty acids or their derivatives and are insoluble in water but soluble in organic solvents. Fatty acids are the building blocks of the fat in our bodies and are in the food we eat. Lipids include many natural oils, waxes, and steroids. Cell walls/membranes are made from lipids and this is exploited by the lipid nanoparticle.

What does nanoparticle mean?

A nanoparticle is a very small particle (between 1 to 100 nanometres in size and a nanometre is one billionth of a meter). A regular is around a millimetre (one thousandth of a metre) thick and a nanometre is one thousand times smaller than that so it is undetectable by the human eye. Nanoparticles can exhibit significantly different physical and chemical properties at that size to what they would when they are regular size particles of the same substance. The definition given by the European Commission states that the particle size of at least half of the particles in the number size distribution must measure 100 nm or below. Most nanoparticles are made up of only a few hundred atoms.

So when we talk of nanoparticles in practice it is actually accepted that it may be a concoction that contains a percentage of what is expected and the behaviour is not identical to what it would be if the particles in the goo were larger. If they somehow coagulate or in some way develop particle growth over time to become larger the behaviour changes.

wikipedia article, Solid lipid nanoparticle, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_lipid_nanoparticle,  timestamp 00:04, 14 September 2021‎‎ states:

Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs, sLNPs), or lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), are nanoparticles composed of lipids. They are a novel pharmaceutical drug delivery system (and part of nanoparticle drug delivery), and a novel pharmaceutical formulation. LNPs as a drug delivery vehicle were first approved in 2018 for the siRNA drug Onpattro. LNPs became more widely known in late 2020, as some COVID-19 vaccines that use RNA vaccine technology coat the fragile mRNA strands with PEGylated lipid nanoparticles as their delivery vehicle (including both the Moderna and the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines). . .

What is Recombinant DNA (RNA)

I am assuming that you are already familiar with the double stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) and the single strand ribonucleic acid (RNA).

Recombinant DNA is not the same as RNA. Recombinant DNA is DNA formed in a laboratory by bringing together genetic material from multiple sources, creating sequences that would not otherwise be found in the genome.

What I get from this is that we get some solid lipid nanoparticles and put inside them the genetic code that is created by the computer. The body is compromised by the solid lipid nanoparticles and allows them to pass their load into the cell with the trojan horse Synthetic Recombinant DNA. The cell reads the DNA and begins to make that code. The code is supposed to be a harmless part of the protein of the virus and so that is what the body begins to produce. The process is irreversible and this is where the autoimmune response comes in. We do not know how much your body will produce or how an individual will react and there is no off switch. It can overwhelm the body or it can cause the body to become specialised into only defending against that threat and ignore countless others. It is altering how your immune system works and there is no off switch. They are using mechanisms to bypass and change how the immune system works. This is dangerous. The body is very intricate and nobody knows how it will react among the diversities of mankind. People who participate in the experiment should be aware that it is an experiment. The way that it is proceeding appears to be unethical to me.

Can this statement by Reuters therefore be true?

Social media users have claimed the presence of lipid nanoparticles in a COVID-19 vaccine means it could contain small robots or computers. This is false - these nanoparticles are tiny lipid droplets that transport and protect the vaccine component.

Reuters StaffFact check: Lipid nanoparticles in a COVID-19 vaccine are there to transport RNA moleculeswww.reuters.com/WEBlast read 2021-09-27

based on the following I conclude that the journalism there is questionable. How could they know that if these are true?

And confirmed here:

In my opinion responsible journalism at Reuters could only make that statement with a proviso such as based on. . .

Reuters could only make the statement that the claims are false if they had done randomised testing of a significant sample or had access to such results. The various reports of people who became magnetic or activated Bluetooth devices indicate that the combination in the nanoparticles varies. When usually credible sources like Reuters make statements like that it gives me cause for concern.

So I get back to my original query. How is it that a medication that came into medical use in 1981 and is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines touted as unsafe when synthetic mRNA is at the same time being promoted as safe? Don't you find that strange?

Dr. Carrie Madej

human studies - compromised health and longevity and possibility of being owned

There have not been enough human studies. Threre is supposed to be 10-15 years of testing. Moderna bragged that they created their genetic code in 2 days. The pharmaceutical companies claim that the code will not be there long-term or taken up permanently but nobody can actually know that since none of the studies will be until the end of of 2022. If the gene is taken up permanently, by law anybody who owns the patent on that synthetic gene will own part or all of you. If it remains long term then you are permanently genetically modified. Genetically modified plants are weaker and do not reproduce. The MONSANTO plants are a great example. This is therefore a possible fate of GM people also.

Is she lying?

According to MedLinePlus:

A gene patent is the exclusive rights to a specific sequence of DNA (a gene) given by a government to the individual, organization, or corporation who claims to have first identified the gene. Once granted a gene patent, the holder of the patent dictates how the gene can be used, in both commercial settings, such as clinical genetic testing, and in noncommercial settings, including research, for 20 years from the date of the patent. Gene patents have often resulted in companies having sole ownership of genetic testing for patented genes.

On June 13, 2013, in the case of the Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that human genes cannot be patented in the U.S. because DNA is a "product of nature." The Court decided that because nothing new is created when discovering a gene, there is no intellectual property to protect, so patents cannot be granted. Prior to this ruling, more than 4,300 human genes were patented. The Supreme Court's decision invalidated those gene patents, making the genes accessible for research and for commercial genetic testing.

The Supreme Court's ruling did allow that DNA manipulated in a lab is eligible to be patented because DNA sequences altered by humans are not found in nature. The Court specifically mentioned the ability to patent a type of DNA known as complementary DNA (cDNA). This synthetic DNA is produced from the molecule that serves as the instructions for making proteins (called messenger RNA).

MedLinePlus Can genes be patented?medlineplus.govWEB2021-09-28

In summary

1. the virus has not been isolated and purified for the experimental vaccine alternative
   
2. The method of diagnosis was not designed for that purpose but for screening
3. The therapy has not been approved and has not been given enough safety testing

How is it that the doctors and politicians are saying that you MUST take this not only for yourself but for others and that they KNOW that it is safe? Something is very wrong here to me. In order to demonstrate that you know there are two things that you could begin with:

• show that the death rate is unchanged immediately (within 10 days) following the start of an inoculation program.
• show that the death rate does not drop immediately (within 10 days) following the end of an inoculation program.
• Show that in countries where there is a high uptake of the mRNA shots that the death rate remains the historical death rate, while in countries with a low uptake the death rate has skyrocketed to above 3%.
  

From the evidence that I have seen none of this has been established. The first two would show that the shots cannot be associated with excess deaths. The last one would show that the shots show an improvement on the natural immunity.

THE THEORY BEHIND TAKING OR NOT TAKING THE VACCINE

Dr. Carrie Madej

In the drug manufacturers' studies they consider their version of a proposed vaccine successful if it prevents one symptom and prevents you from having one positive PCR test. You can still be contagious and you can still get the disease and you can still die and on top of that PFIZER said that it was only expected to last two months and that is not a guarantee because the test results have not yet come in. If you agree to take these shots you are agreeing to participate in a stage 3 experiment. DOCTORS AND NURSES SHOULD BE TELLING YOU THAT YOU ARE PART OF A RESEARCH EXPERIMENT. The risks are all at you.

One of the research doctors came public and said that the 'vaccinated' people could produce even more destructive versions of the virus than were possible before and they will become the danger to society. There is supposed to be 18 sub-units of HIV-1 in the vaccine and people are testing positive for HIV-1 after taking the vaccine and the companies are claiming that it is a false positive but the studies have not been completed yet so how do they know?

Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosome_8, timestamp 23:42, 20 September 2021‎, Chromosome 8 says: Chromasome 8 spans about 145 million base pairs (the building material of DNA) and represents between 4.5 and 5.0% of the total DNA in cells. About 8% of its genes are involved in brain development and function, and about 16% are involved in cancer.

HIV-1 is the most common type of Human Immunodeficiency Virus. It attacks your bodys immune system. The virus destroys CD4 cells. These cells help your body fight infections. HIV-1 can severely damage your immune system and lead to Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). The HIV virus uses reverse transcription which can alter DNA.

Dr. Carrie Madej

The body learns to attack the virus code as per the vaccine alternative, but there is a lot of human code that is a part of the genetic mishmash of the synthetic virus. What if the body learns to attack those parts of itself like parts of the intelligence or reproductive system? What if it alters chromasome 8. This type of experimentation is likely to cause:

1. high infertility rate
   
2. increase in autoimmune disorders
3. likely higher mutation rate - cancers

Based on the global change in the death rate these measures are unjustifiable.

Is this not something that should be explained to people being joined to an experiment?

TRANSFECTION

Dr. Carrie Madej

Transfection

is the way that people make genetically modified organisms. Every organism has a code called a genome. you can read it like sentences or translate into binary code for computers. Using technologies like CRISPR we can replace one sentence or word with another. Depending on how it is done the change can be temporary or become permanent. The drug companies are claiming that it is temporary but that is being dishonest. In the constrained environment of the lab that has been true but what happens when it is introduced to the complexity of the human body in diverse racial mixes and conditions?

The body has reverse transcriptive enzymes. We already know that these types of enzymes exist and the question is what happens if or when the 'vaccine' RNA encounters this in the body? The enzymes in our bodies can cause us to reverse it an carry it into our genome and there is now research to prove that it can become permanent. The scientists know these risks but are manipulating their words to conceal the risks. Science has resorted to manipulation and dishonesty.

Reverse transcriptase (RT), also known as RNA-dependent DNA polymerase, is a DNA polymerase enzyme that transcribes (converts) single-stranded RNA into DNA.

According to Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_transcriptase, Reverse transcriptase, timestamp 15:24, 16 September 2021‎: A reverse transcriptase (RT) is an enzyme used to generate complementary DNA (cDNA) from an RNA template, a process termed reverse transcription. Reverse transcriptases are used by certain viruses such as HIV and hepatitis B to replicate their genomes, by retrotransposon mobile genetic elements to proliferate within the host genome, and by eukaryotic cells to extend the telomeres at the ends of their linear chromosomes. . .

So the thing does exist. So if the proposed vaccine alternative contains HIV and HIV uses this mechanism, is that not something that potential subjects of an experiment should have explained?

hydrogel and Luciferase

According to wikipedia  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luciferase timestamp 17:12, 8 September 2021,‎ Luciferase: Luciferase is a generic term for the class of oxidative enzymes that produce bioluminescence, and is usually distinguished from a photoprotein. The name was first used by Raphaël Dubois who invented the words luciferin and luciferase, for the substrate and enzyme, respectively. Both words are derived from the Latin word lucifer, meaning "lightbearer", which in turn is derived from the Latin words for "light" (lux) and "to bring or carry" (ferre). Luciferases are widely used in biotechnology, for microscopy and as reporter genes, for many of the same applications as fluorescent proteins. However, unlike fluorescent proteins, luciferases do not require an external light source, but do require addition of luciferin, the consumable substrate.

Dr. Carrie Madej

LUCIFERASE

is a bio-luminescent crystal. They use two, one is neon green and the other is Luciferase. They use these in producing the vaccine but we do not know if it remains part of the vaccine. They (the crystals) go inside the body and they prove that you have been transfected. You could not detect it with the naked eye but a cellphone, for example, could be modified to detect it. They also propose to use this technology to give us a digital ID or tattoo so that we are individually known to any smart device so that we become part of the internet of everything. The idea is to give us something like a barcode so that we do not need a wallet or to carry currency. That sounds convenient but what about the other side. It means that you are always connected and people who do not necessarily have your best interest at heart know where you are and maybe even what you are thinking. The technology can tell if you are lying, what kind of chemicals are in your body, and based on that even what you are thinking.
These chemicals are introduced to your body in something called hydrogel. The hydrogel is the technology that envelops the synthetic mRNA to disguise it from your body but it has multiple uses. It can have bio-sensors in it. These can collect data on things like your blood sugar but also data that can be used to discern your thoughts. It gathers the data and there are proposals to have it go directly to the 5G cloud. Technology in the cloud would analyse it and give us crypto currency or social credits based on whether or not you are a good person or a 'bad' person.

A HYDROGEL is a network of cross-linked polymer chains that are hydrophilic i.e. dissolve or be dispersed in water. Polymers are made from monomers. A monomer is an organic compound like water (H₂O) but polymers can be polymerised i.e. joined or linked together to form a bigger entity. The hydrogel (cross-linked polymers) is what envelopes the synthetic mRNA to fool the cell. We talked of lipid nanoparticles before and the hydrogel is the goo that contains these. The problem is that this goo can also contain other things like many biosensors that gather data on the body and can transfer that data to a device. Through these biosensors all kinds of information can be collected continuously and transferred via the cloud, 5G or whatever, and this is what Dr. Madej sees as the threat.

Apparently they can collect data on the type of thoughts that we are having based on chemicals in our body. According to Dr. Carrie Madej the proposal is to give people digital credits for good behaviour determined by the presence or absence of these chemicals. If you lack credits it will affect options for the neighbourhood you live in or the school you can attend. She goes on to say that Bill Gates has proposed to do this to the whole world by 2030 beginning with Atlanta as a pilot project. She claims that the software is already in the cellphones but they need to get the gel into people to collect the data. This is the foundation of patent 20200606 and it is being tested in Africa.

What I can say is that there is a patent 20200606 and it does specify basically what she says that it does.

Luciferase is a generic term for enzymes that produce bioluminescence. According to Dr. Carrie Madej It is used in producing the synthetic vaccine alternatives so that they can check for the bioluminescence to see if the vaccine code is integrated into the cell. A cellphone could then be modified to detect if you have been vaccinated. This approach is also to be used to give every person a genetic ID that can be detected by an electronic device. This is to be used in joining people to the internet of everything. You would then be permanently connected to the cloud. The software is already in the smart devices and all they need to do is turn it on but it requires the hydrogel that gathers the data to be in people. Depending on the credibility of your social network you may be able to satisfy yourself of the truth/error of her claims based on the people who demonstrate changes in their bodies after taking the synthetic vaccine alternatives. I my case I have seen too many peole talking about connecting via Bluetooth and becoming magnetized to dismiss what she says.

I have looked up patent 20200606 and it does exist just as she said. I also know that the implementation of the internet of things started years ago because I was exposed to it in Singapore. The plan was for your house or car or whatever to know you and adjust to your preset preferences. At the time the trigger for your presence was an external device or something implanted under the skin but that was not considered the most efficient method. The new micro devices and genetic markers seem much cheaper with the CRISPR tecchnology.

DEPOPULATION AND INFERTILITY

Dr. Madej claims that these are in the mRNA. The presence of these in the mRNA means that the body can learn to attack the woman's placenta and the man's sperm. This means that the rate of infertility among those taking the vaccine can be very high. I do not know what is in the mRNA and there is not clear statement to the public providing any guarantee therefore I find it difficult to understand how people can claim that they know for a fact that it is untrue without such a clear published obligation. If you cannot produce the evidence then you really don't know and should state what you are basing your argument on. I have found statements in the press unsupported by scientific evidence, as a matter of fact they do not seem to me to believe that it is a requirement any more. I believe that when people have evidence they flaunt it so when I see these claims of false or true debunked, as they say, I go looking for the empirical evidence. I think that without that these claims should be regarded as hypotheses. Based on the possible impact of the most unlikely possibility, I believe that they shoud be taken seriously and tested for.

Syncytin Wikipedia
Syncytin-1 also known as enverin is a protein found in humans and other primates that is encoded by the ERVW-1 gene (endogenous retrovirus group W envelope member 1). Syncytin-1 is a cell-cell fusion protein whose function is best characterized in placental development. The placenta in turn aids in embryo attachment to the uterus and establishment of a nutrient supply.

CONTROL

Carrie Madej says code for chromosome 8 is in the vaccine

Chromasome 8 handles intelligence. The mRNA could attack impact the mind negatively causing people to be more docile. Another concern is that if the code was taken up permanently then it would mean that we could be owned by whoever owns the patent. A third issue is that the nanotechnology is a way to know everything about a person, very private things, and so whom do we trust to collect all that information on us? According to Dr. Madej they have said that it is to be collected by a supercomputer which they would program to do predictive policing. This means that you would not have to actually commit a crime. In this futuristic scenario you could think something in the heat of the moment and it would generate the chemicals to indicate your thoughts. In reality you would never do it because you have a conscience but the computer would pick it up. All of these are certainly possible and we are forging ahead without the controls in place to prevent authoritarian control of the society.Should Christians be concerned that a complete atheist or worse could have access to this power? Can you trust the masters of today's society without the necessary checks and balances in place? Do we know what they should be? Do we even care enough to insist of proper testing and full disclosure?

Exploitation and abuse

Nuremberg code - No human should be forced into an experiment. What has been happening is that leaders have been invoking emergency powers when there is no real emergency and bullying people into compliance. Under the emergency act of the individual countries they are claiming that they are not bound by the Nuremberg convention. They are banking on us not knowing our rights under international law or local law. Have these countries actually seen any emergency conditions warranting such extreme measures?

The Charter of the International Military Tribunal – Annex to the Agreement for the prosecution and punishment of the major war criminals of the European Axis (usually referred to as the Nuremberg Charter or London Charter) was the decree issued by the European Advisory Commission on 8 August 1945 that set down the rules and procedures by which the Nuremberg trials were to be conducted. This then served as a model for the Tokyo Charter issued months later against the Empire of Japan.

The charter stipulated that crimes of the European Axis Powers could be tried. Three categories of crimes were defined: crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Article 7 of the charter also stated that holding an official position was no defense to war crimes. Obedience to orders could only be considered in mitigation of punishment if the Tribunal determined that justice so required. . .


wikipediaNuremberg Charterhttps://en.wikipedia.orgWEB2021-10-03

. . .The ten points of the code were given in the section of the judges' verdict entitled "Permissible Medical Experiments":

        The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
        The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
        The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
        The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
        No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
        The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
        Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
        The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
        During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
        During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.


. . .In his 2014 review, Gaw observes that the Kodex "not only entered the legal landscape, but also became the prototype for all future codes of ethical practice across the globe."[11] The idea of free or informed consent also served as the basis for International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects proposed by the World Health Organization.

wikipedia Nuremberg Codehttps://en.wikipedia.orgWEB2021-10-03

VMAT2 gene

I do not believe that anybody is saying that currently the vaccine alternatives have targeted the VMAT2 gene. The issue is that with the lax regulations, abuse of the Nuremberg Code, lack of accountability and seeming impotence of citizens to determine their own destiny in democratic countries where does it end? Would you even know if it had started given the current level of scrutiny and reporting to the public?

Emotions and thoughts are actually physical in our body and can be mapped. The masters of society were able to take people who are considered very spiritual (yogis and such like) in the community and study them and do brain scans and they were able to they were able to find the gene that all connected them, i.e. that was over active. According to Dr. Madej they said that they could use it in for military purposes. If they could knock it out then they could overcome opponents easier. They wanted to use it against other countries. According to her Dr. Craig Venter wanted to patent that but could not, because it was something natural so they went ahead and produced something synthetic to introduce to the body.

The God gene hypothesis proposes that human spirituality is influenced by heredity and that a specific gene, called vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2), predisposes humans towards spiritual or mystic experiences.[1] The idea has been proposed by geneticist Dean Hamer in the 2004 book called The God Gene: How Faith is Hardwired into our Genes.

The God gene hypothesis is based on a combination of behavioral genetic, neurobiological and psychological studies.[2] The major arguments of the hypothesis are: (1) spirituality can be quantified by psychometric measurements; (2) the underlying tendency to spirituality is partially heritable; (3) part of this heritability can be attributed to the gene VMAT2; (4) this gene acts by altering monoamine levels; and (5) spirituality provides an evolutionary advantage by providing individuals with an innate sense of optimism.

wikipediaGod genehttps://en.wikipedia.org/WEB2021-10-03

HOW CAN THEY PROFIT FROM THIS?

The present covid situation is a goldmine for a vaccine company. The global population is between seven and eight billion. If you could make a $1 profit on even half of that it is $3.5 billion. If you could get a mandatory vaccine then the more times people have to shoot-up in a year the greater the profits. The normal cost of R&D have been subsidised, the marketing is taken on by national efforts to drive the vaccine program. The normal cost of underwriting has been absorbed by government. It is big bucks with no risk. Any CEO worth his salt just has to drive profits at any risk because there is no cost for culpability. There is a proverb in the business sector that recommends that you should always take advantage of a panic. Under panic conditions you can take advantage of hordes of people. Lions do it all the time. Send one upwind to throw the scent and the others remain in ambush downwind. It can be repeated again and again. Easy food.

Conspiracy theories

Have there been any conspiracies in recent memory at all? Whenever someone raises issues that oppose the status quo we hear about conspiracy theories. Were the Christians behind the conspiracies or was it big business and big government?

• Did George Bush try to kill Chavez and spark off an international incident that ended with sevgere economic crisis in venezuela?
• Was the situation in the Philipines a conspiracy theory?
• Was the situation in the Panama a conspiracy theory?
• Was the situation in the Nicaragua a conspiracy theory?
• Was the situation in Cuba a conspiracy theory?
• Was what the French did to Haiti a conspiracy theory?
• Was what the French did in Africa a conspiracy theory?
• Was the fishing crisis in the Sudan that was caused by the big fishing industry and lead to the sudanese pirate situation a conspiracy theory?
• Is the plastics problem that is beign caused by the fishing industry and blamed on the consumer a conspiracy theory?
• Is blood diamonds a conspiracy theory?
• Is strip mining for oil in africa a conspiracy theory?
• Is exploitation of cocoa farmers a conspiracy theory?
• Was proping up baby doc and papa doc a conspiracy theory?
• Was the Tuskege experiment set up by the CDC a conspiracy theory?
• Was pushing milk formula on Africans to replace breast milk a conspiracy theory?
• Was claiming weapons of mass destruction to take down Sadam Husseing to get at his oil a conspiracy theory?
• Bill and Melinda Gates foundation in India - https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/healthcare/biotech/healthcare/controversial-vaccine-studies-why-is-bill-melinda-gates-foundation-under-fire-from-critics-in-india/articleshow/41280050.cms?from=mdr

I have not even touched on the Wall Street crash or Wells Fargo, or valiant etc. Who has been the culprit?

Acknowledgements

https://www.publichealthontario.ca/en/diseases-and-conditions/infectious-diseases/respiratory-diseases/novel-coronavirus/lab-testing-ontario/covid-19-pcr-testing

https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/antisense