
Significant elements of Pentecost can be distilled by comparing and contrasting Pentecost of the Old with Pentecost of the New Testament. A study like this is very humbling because, just as I believe that I have seen improvements on what I was taught, it means that others have been doing the same and someone else will improve on what I am saying. To me it seems blatantly obvious that the Holy Spirit was not first made available at Pentecost but it was SHED ABROAD at Pentecost. That is what Paul was explaining to the gentile Romans (Romans 5:5). Before that it was confined to a select group. Once you have a good understanding of the subject of Baptism then read on to understand why I am so convinced. You can also check for why this is an important part of the Pattern for life given by God.
It might also be useful to consider a summary of the subjects presented in articles on the subject of Pentecost:
Significant Elements of Pentecost
The Holy Spirit was active immediately following Passover in both the Old Testament (Exodus 13:21) and New Testament (Matthew 13:21 and Matthew 27:52-53). Consider the following:
- They (the Holy Spirit and Passover) were made separate matters since Passover in both the Old Testament and New Testament (separation from Egypt in the Old, separation from the sinful world in the New).
- They had the pillar of fire in the Old and He breathed on them and said receive the spirit in the New
- God was with Old Testament Israel in the Tabernacle (Exodus 33:7) hence they had the Holy Spirit. Our bodies are the Temple of God in the New and it was how the Father revealed things to Simon Peter (Matthew 16:17).
- The Law, the Spirit and marriage are linked through Pentecost (The marriage at Sinai in Exodus 20 vs the marriage of the Church – 2 Corinthians 11:2, John 6:44, Romans 2:14-15).
- What do you mean when you say that they did not have the Holy Spirit or that it was only working with them but not in them? How can something affect your thoughts and attitude without being in you?
People claim that the Holy Spirit was given at Pentecost. It seems to me that it was not. The doctrine about the Holy Spirit working with them but not in them is an unscriptural invention drawn from John 14:17 contrived to cope with the volume of evidence against the theory. The earnest of the Spirit is given at baptism which is symbolic of Passover not Pentecost (Colossians 2:12). We also see the evidence in Acts.
They were filled with the Holy Spirit not given it for the first time. What do we see almost immediately after the fulfilment of Passover.
Verses 22 and 23 are together but people often quote the first part separately to give credence to their claim that it was intended for the future. It was a commitment that He started at that point, before Pentecost. Both in the Old and New Testaments the Holy Spirit is given at Passover not Pentecost. In the Old Testament it was represented by water and fire e.g. water in the cloud and of course the pillar of fire. In the New Testament it was given by the laying on of hands following Baptism, which is symbolised by the Red Sea and is part of the Passover season. Then comes Sinai where we get Pentecost, but something special was added by Christ immediately after His Resurrection.
Nobody owns the Holy Spirit. Even Paul said that after all of his effort he could be a castaway (1 Corinthians 9:27). It is given as a seal and can be taken away.
The concept of the Holy Spirit with you and not in you suggests that somehow it becomes something that is completely under your control. In reality it always works the same way, it is Christ and the Father joining with our spirit and there is no difference before and after any point in time, that is just how it works.
Hebrews 1:6-7
So what did happen at Pentecost? What does the cloven tongues of fire mean? To start with let us explore Hebrews 1:6-7.
In Hebrews the writer is combining scriptures from two separate places (1) let all the angels of God worship him...
, (2) maketh his angels spirits...
, but where are those places? Where does he get this from and what does he mean? By the way, notice that the fire was cloven, one part for the Father and one part for Christ.
Who maketh his angels spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire
The second part is easy to spot.
But taken on its own the phrase does not make sense. The first thing that we need to establish is that the Hebrew word translated as angel
has an everyday meaning.
- a messenger.
- (specifically, of God) an angel.3.
- thus, also) a prophet, priest or teacher.
It means messenger
and that is what is being spoken of also in Hebrews. He turns His messengers into spirit beings and his servants, who are the same messengers, into flames of fire (fire purifies and gives light). One of the problems with understanding this verse is unscriptural beliefs about angels. According to the Bible angels are our older brothers. We were created lower than them for a time but will be like them eventually. When Christ explained the Kingdom of God He explained it in terms of angelic behaviour i.e. marry and not marry.
Spirits represent the apostolic work in the Church. Apostolic has to do with being sent. In general, spirit relates to God acting through an agent, e.g. His Church. At present it is by the earnest of the Spirit, but later as fully formed spirit beings i.e. in the resurrected Church as described in Revelation. In Revelation 5:6 it says referring to the eyes and horns in the imagery of Christ(horns demonstrate the power)that these are seven Spirits of God sent forth into all the earth
. The word for sent forth
is apostello
and is clearly the source of apostle
. Since there were not seven apostles, this refers to the function of spreading the Gospel by the seven churches, but apostles did more than just talk, they also demonstrated the power.
The first place that we find apostle in Revelation is in chapter 2 verse 2 dealing with the Synagogue of Satan. The Church was able to recognise and distinguish a fake Jew from a real one and by extension, fake apostles from real ones. Revelation shows us various ways of looking at the Church. 7 spirits (seven being a word of completion) show that this one message was sent to the world by His apostles that are complete and whole as a group.
In Psalms and Hebrews, quoted above, angel
and minister
is referring to the same subject by using different words, and the action of maketh
applies to both, in other words it is taking place to produce two outcomes on the same subject. The previous verse tells us that all angels worship him. It is His angels/messengers that are made spirits and these spirits are sent to the world. The angels made spirits begins with Passover where Christ purchased our eternal lives which we then redeem after Baptism by the laying on of hands when we are given the earnest of the Spirit. On the other hand the made flame of fire is what happened at Pentecost and together these prepared them to be sent to all the world as apostles. There is a greater fulfilment of this at the Resurrection.
Christ said then when He left He would send His Spirit. Was it the same spirit that was in John the Baptist?
let all the angels of God worship him
The first part of the scripture is somewhat more challenging. The writer of Hebrews said let all the angels of God worship Him. Where does that come from? Some people believe that it comes from Deuteronomy.
That is what it says in the KJV and that is not very helpful. In The New Living Translation it says this:
The NLT introduces God's angels
to the sentence. Is that what Christ intends us to focus on in Hebrews? The Hebrew manuscripts that were preserved and used by the Rabbis is called the Masoretic Text. The NLT has used different manuscripts, the LXX or Septuagint, which is a Greek translation of the Old Testament that also predates the New Testament. In researching this I came across an article at the website of CARM - Christian Apologetics and Research Ministy entitled What verse is Hebrews 1:6 citing and why isn’t it in my Old Testament?
by Luke Wayne, dated Oct 2, 2017, https://carm.org/what-verse-hebrews-1-6-citing-why-not-in-my-old-testament#footnote2_ogej7i0 which sheds even more light on it than they realise. The article claims that a reading of Martin Abegg Jr., Peter Flint, and Eugene Ulrich, The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible (HarperCollins Books, 1999) 193 presents the reading as:
Rejoice, O heavens together with him; and bow down to him all you gods, for he will avenge the blood of his sons, and will recompense those who hate him, and will atone for the land and his people,(Deuteronomy 32:43, 4QDeutq, Dead Sea Scrolls).
The word translated gods
is Elohim
. Another place to be considered for the origin of the verse in Hebrews is Psalm 97,
You can check this one for sure and see that the word translated god
is Elohim
. Now let us go back and see what the writer of Hebrews was saying.
These angels are Elohim. They are of the family of God and have the same nature. God makes all his messengers to be elohim. They are sons of God just as we hope to be: immortal elohim. The elohim of God is us in the future with our elder brothers the angels. This is what is given in type on the day of Pentecost. The Church is accepted as the immortal bride of Christ signifying the same nature i.e. elohim
and we all worship Him.
With You and soon in you
I cannot reconcile the knowledge that Joshua had the Holy Spirit in him (Numbers 27:18) with a belief that the Spirit was not in the disciples before Pentecost. If the Holy Spirit was not in these seventy then how did they accomplish this?
To me at the root of this misunderstanding is a lack of comprehension of what is explained by Philippians, For I know that this shall turn to my salvation through your prayer, and the supply of the Spirit of Jesus Christ
, Philippians 1:19 (KJV). Notice that it is the Spirit of Christ and hence would not be available when He was human on earth. This same Spirit is the Spirit of God. Notice the two used interchangeably in the same verse.
And in the same chapter
In verse 3 Paul points out that he is talking of the Spirit of the living God which represents the Father as dominant. In verse 17 he shows that it is the Spirit of the Lord and Lord
refers to Christ. So we understand that it would not be available by Christ's power while He was mortal, but at all other times. Christ in the old form would have been available to John the Baptist before Christ's conception but the New Christ with the experience of mortality (Hebrews 4:14-15) who can comfort us from personal experience, would only be available to him in the flesh while He was a man. Furthermore the new Spirit, that by the suffering of Christ had earned the Kingdom, would not be available until after His resurrection. Thereafter the Spirit would not have been as it was in the wilderness when Christ fasted and Satan claimed to own the world, it would now be a Spirit of power over all the Earth having wrested it from Satan. So the Spirit that was with them in the form of Christ was later in them as is now in us by the Holy Spirit. In other words the Holy Spirit during Christ's mortal life was an exceptional situation of having the wholly spiritual Father somehow combine with a fully mortal Christ. Furthermore that Christ was constrained by although having bested Satan He had not yet given His life as ransom for humanity. That presented certain limitations because He had not yet discharged all of His obligations.
Why was the Spirit not available?
According to the scripture what prevented the spirit was the Resurrection.
I understand glorified to refer to the Resurrection. That is when Christ was changed as is seen by Him having no blood but still sustaining a physical body. There was no pain or blood when Thomas poked around in the wounds that were only three days old. In John 20:27 Christ told him to put in his hand not just his finger. There is more to that than can be covered here so we just leave it as that.
The Comforter
Christ said that they should wait and receive power at Pentecost. Was that power the Comforter? I think not. Actually, to be precise they were to receive another comforter. Comfort tends to give you peace of mind. I propose that the another comforter
had to do with some extremely vivid memories that would assist them in preaching the Gospel, but lets begin with John.
They were to receive another comforter so what comforter did they have then? At the time their comforter was Christ living with them. They knew Him. This is explained in verses 15-17. In verse 18 Christ emphasized that it would be Him just in another form. He then went on to further explain how it works. Although they had access to the Holy Spirit for other things (including access to the Father) their comfort came from Christ who consoled Thomas. Further explanation is given in verse 23. Although they would continue to have the access to the Father which He promised them, it would be we
at that time in the future, and not just the Father represented in the Holy Spirit as it was at that time. In verses 13-14 they were given the right to approach the Father. The only way that I know that would be possible is if the Father did it (John 6:44) and that would not be done bodily (Matthew 16:17) but through the earnest of the Holy Spirit in them to identify them as His (John 10:27). II Corinthians 1:21-22 [KJV] says, Now he which stablisheth us with you in Christ, and hath anointed us, is God; [22] Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts
. It would be the Father who sealed them upon Christ's request. Now back to John 14, in verse 26 Christ elaborates further. The Comforter would be the Holy Spirit sent by the Father on Christ's authority but would now include Him (Christ their present comforter as memories including everything that he had told them). At the incident with Thomas Christ fit the description that He gave them of what spirit is and what a comforter is. The power was something else which we examine later as the Promise of the Father.
One function of the Holy Spirit was to replace Christ as comforter i.e. as the source of their peace of mind. Christ spelled out the job of the comforter in verses 8-15, where among other things, He explains that the Comforter part of the Holy Spirit would receive of Him and hence speak as it would come from Him. The summary is in verse 8, And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment
. Just so that we are on the same page the Hebrew for reprove
means to confute
i.e. to prove a person, argument, or claim to be absolutely false, invalid, or incorrect using clear evidence or strong logic. This means that it is to show the world that its understanding of these matters is false. The comforter's job was (i) to correct people's understanding of what is sinful - the bad, (ii) what is good character/righteousness - the good, and (iii) what judgement i.e. his official pronouncement (rewarding good or bad) truly is. The world did not believe Christ about His Law and so the Comforter would do the convincing (sin is the transgression of the Law [I John 3:4]). It will have to convince the world of what is the right way to live because He will not be there to do it. It will have to convince the world that there will be a judgement (rewards for good or evil) and what that judgement is because even the prince of this world has had to face judgement. The Holy spirit will guide them into truth (thy word is truth [John 17:17]) because they would need knowledge and understanding which the Holy Spirit would help them recall as memories of Christ. The Comforter would do all of these things so the Comforter was critical to Pentecost. Take note that this is exactly what Peter did at Pentecost. But the Comforter as Christ bodily, did more, and was required before Pentecost. At Pentecost the Comforter was given additional power which we will discuss in a while.
Baptism of the Holy Ghost AND baptism of fire
John and Christ had different types of baptism.
Baptism in the name of the Holy Ghost according to Matthew 28:19 is done by all servants of God. Baptism with fire and with the Holy Ghost seems to be different.
Is baptism in the name of the Holy Ghost the same as baptism with the Holy Ghost? It does not appear to be the same to me. First of all Matthew 28:19 is widely considered to be a spurious scripture and to establish doctrine on the evidence of something like that would for me be reckless. I would encourage the readers to investigate that on their own. On the other hand what the other scriptures are saying is sequential and prophetic. John baptised with water. This was followed by Christ baptising with the Holy Spirit not many days hence
but what about the baptism with fire? The baptism with fire appears to follow the baptism with the Holy Spirit. First let us look at the context of what Matthew said.
Matthew began by recording John referring to Psalm 1.
The psalm actually explains the whole process in detail except for the matter of repentance and conversion. In the psalm the tree does not change and neither does the ungodly. In contrast the emphasis in the book of Acts is upon repentance and change. First notice what Paul added.
The pillar of fire was the same as the cloud.
They were baptized in the cloud but they were not enveloped, it was over them. I propose that the cloven tongues did the same as the pillar of fire. It represented Christ leading them and illuminating the way forward. That baptism by fire was not intended to destroy but to lead to salvation. At the same time there must be a baptism to remove all corruption because corruption cannot inherit incorruption
. What we are cannot inherit what we must be in order to truly be the bride of Christ.
Baptism of the Spirit and of fire appears to be completed when we become immortal but is now being done as a transition by an earnest that leads to salvation. Consider panning for gold where the Holy Spirit acts as water and also does the smelting by fire so that the gold is refined. On the other hand humans can be filled with the HS as much as we can handle, like John the Baptist. The Holy Spirit is what produces the good fruit whether by nurturing the tree or refining what is there. With no Holy Spirit there is no fruit worthy of repentance and hence no forgiveness.
So now let us put what Matthew said in context.
John encouraged people to admit their sins. Even Pharisees and Sadducees recognized that they had sins and needed to change. He explained that he could assist them with recognizing the need but the challenge for them was to bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance
. That challenge was to be met by someone else.
The spirit that you have determines your future. Christ can make a change to that spirit by the Holy Spirit. If you refuse the Holy Spirit then your future is damnation.
John was limited to water unto repentance
but Christ introduced the Holy Ghost, and with fire
. John's ability was necessary but ended with repentance. It worked in the daylight. Christ continued from there with the Holy Ghost and continued with fire. That works in the darkness. They both lead to salvation if we follow. Repentance is not the end.
There is no question that people have been receiving the Holy Spirit before Pentecost.
The Holy Spirit is not static. It depends on things that we do not completely understand but includes how prepared our heart is to accept it. When was this to happen?
God does not hold off giving us an earnest (down payment) of the Holy Spirit but the climax of the thing that I understand to be baptism with the Holy Spirit and with fire comes at the Resurrection.
The promise of the Father
What was this promise that Luke wrote about?
many people believe that it was the Comforter and scriptures such as these are given in support of that.
But take another look at what Luke said in context.
He says nothing about a Comforter. The Comforter was His promise not the Father's. The promise had to do with being endued with power
. That is what the Holy Spirit was intended to achieve in Acts.
They had been baptized by John with the baptism of repentance but now it was to be the Baptism of the Holy Spirit. Luke did not write about the comforter. It was John. The promise in Acts must be something that Luke was aware of and had previously written. Up to that point what they had was the same as what others were given all through the Old Testament. They were now to be given something special that was not available before. The power to preach the Gospel to the world including to gentiles. The Holy Spirit and eternal life was already given but only to a select few and primarily Israelites. Consider the story of the thief on the cross, John the Baptist's father Zechariah, and also his mother Elizabeth, the prophetess named Anna (notice that she was a prophetess), John the Baptist himself and so on? When did the Holy Spirit stop to restart its availability? The answer is also hinted at in John.
Notice that it is not Christ that this blessing would flow from. Let us read more of what Luke actually said in context.
Verse 8 says that they were to receive power, not the Holy Spirit. They already had that. If you think otherwise then the first question that I want to ask is from Acts 1:2 which was just quoted above. How did Christ give commandments unto the apostles whom he had chosen
. Was the Holy Ghost around at that time? But they had to wait for the Holy Ghost to come upon
them as recorded in verse 8. It did not say receive for the first time, it says come upon. From Old Testament time the Holy Spirit came upon people like Balaam so that he prophesied. The Holy Spirit came upon Othniel (Judges 3:9-10), Gideon (Judges 6:34), Jephthah (Judges 11:29) and Samson (Judges 13:25; 14:6, 19; 15:14). It also came upon seventy people as far back as Numbers (Numbers 11:25) and the same thing happened when the apostles received power. Ezekiel obviously had the Holy Spirit but we see times when it came upon him and gave him power (Ezekiel 2:2, Ezekiel 3:24). I could cite others. Why is it considered to be so strange in Acts 2 or when Christ told His disciples to wait for power from the Holy Spirit? It is the same thing that happened to Philip in Acts 8:39, when he was taken away from the eunuch. It does not mean that you do not have the Holy Spirit before or that you will or will not have it after.
It is obvious that when we read of the Holy Spirit we are reading of different things at different stages.
The HS is the earnest. Was that given?
The HS was the source of supernatural power. Was that given?
The HS was the comforter. Was that given?
What was given at Pentecost and what does given
mean? As I see it one thing that was given was the ability to pass the HS to others i.e. it flowed from them. It was now theirs to give. They were given power not initial use of the Holy Spirit. Before that they could only receive the HS but now they could extend the family by giving it. Giving life is a feature of a marriage. That union takes place at Pentecost. This ability to produce based on the relationship is what was ascribed to Mary and Joseph before their actual marriage. The betrothal was sufficient to legally produce seed.
John spoke of the Comforter but the Comforter was given soon after the Resurrection so that Christ could comfort Thomas. The Comforter is the Holy Spirit but is the Holy Spirit the Comforter? No. The Holy Spirit goes beyond comforting. According to the definition given earlier the comforter has an evangelical function ascribed to it in John 16:8 by the meaning of reprove
or confute
and that was added in the New Testament. Notice what John said:
Your defence attorney or advocate has a duty to refute. If you look at Job, he had no comforter (Job 16:2) or advocate because he was pleading to represent himself (Job 9; 13; 16:21). Comforting is a feature of the Holy Spirit that was added by Christ after the resurrection. Job never had it.
I submit that the promise of the Father was not the Holy Spirit but was assisted by the Holy Spirit. It was the power to spread the Gospel and share the Holy Spirit, features of the Holy Spirit available only after the marriage to the Church.
He could not fully comfort a wife before marriage. Some elements of comforting are reserved for marriage.
growth and development
It is that side of marriage that we see in the disciples in Acts 2. The disciples were all hand picked by Christ and were drawn directly by the Father. Now the power is given to the disciples as was picked up by Matthew.
If you go back to Matthew 18:3 you will see that Christ was talking about the Kingdom of Heaven. He was telling His disciples about how to get there. He talked about saving and going after lost sheep. At the end of the conversation He revealed that they already had tremendous power. That is the power that they were promised in Matthew 16. By Matthew 18 they already had power to decide who was or was not a part of the Church. Christ said that He would be in their midst and the only way that he could do that is by the Holy Spirit. Maybe that is what people mean by the Holy Spirit working with others but the change that was taking place inside them was the Holy Spirit. Calling people was something that Christ formerly reserved for Himself but He was now shifting the job to His disciples. It started in Matthew 4:19 where He promised to make them fishers of men. By Matthew 28 Christ now had all power. He could now give them full power in His name and that is what He did.
Remember that I said earlier that Matthew 28:19 was spurious, but it is right in the middle of the extract that I just used. The problem with Matthew 28:19 is that it has been modified to provide evidence for the Trinity, but part of the verse is valid and needs to be for Matthew 28:20 to make any sense. The part that is valid is Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in my name.
It does not go on to say that we will be with you just I am with you alway
. Christ is the only authority necessary for His Kingdom and it is His Kingdom that is the objective of Baptism. That is what the whole Bible supports.
John records the sequence because from John 15:4-5 they were expected to bear fruit (implying marriage of church) but were not yet ready. By John 21 they were ready but they needed direction because Peter decided that he was going fishing when the job was to be a fisher of men. Christ appeared and He asked them if they caught anything and they said no. He told them where to let down the nets and they caught a bounty. He then impressed upon Peter what his coming role was. By Acts 2 Peter was ready and understood his direction. He knew that he had to take the lead when the signal came. The signal was the trigger to become a fisher of men. Luke said that they had to wait on a signal (Luke 24:49) where they would be clothed with the Spirit not receive it for the first time. Now through their preaching the Church is to be extended i.e. bear fruit. Through their actions people are exposed to the truth and drawn to Christ and they are many more than Christ did directly. The disciples had been growing in the power of the Holy Spirit all along.
Romans 8 says that this tremendous growth could not take place without the Holy Spirit in them. It is the only way that we are converted and grow. Let us pick up some from verse 4.
There had to be a spiritual change in the minds of the disciples not just with them. People know Romans 8:7 by heart but it is frightening how we are able to forget what we know and what is obvious when we are bamboozled by spiritual sounding rhetoric. You cannot grow spiritually without the Holy Spirit full stop. The disciples grew spiritually hence they had the Holy Spirit. They got additional power to be fishers of men and caused the Church to bear fruit.

